View Full Version : Class Definition
01-06-2008, 11:49 AM
I was looking for a definition of what makes a bike eligable for the "Woods Class" in motocross. All I found was that it is for enduro bikes. I have a KTM 300 XCW. Since this is and enduro/hare scrambles bike, does it qualify for the woods class?
01-06-2008, 08:38 PM
They let me run my 200xc last year, even let me use my Master C number and back ground's. JR runs his X model honda. funfun
01-08-2008, 06:49 PM
I am sitting here reading the forum and mentioned to Kevin your question. He said to tell you you are good to go. He says it is any non-MX bike that is made for off road is good, usually these have the ability to hook up lights if needed, but lights are not required.
01-09-2008, 01:03 PM
The saying goes, "behind every great man, there is a great woman"
In MX, we have...Debi!
01-10-2008, 07:32 AM
Amen to that my friend! banmul
01-28-2008, 04:12 PM
How fast are the people in the Woods class? Would I be better off riding C class or this class?
01-29-2008, 08:53 PM
I race both. They are different and it really depends on who shows. In woods class you can jump - so if you don't like that, race 35 no jump.
Woods class is usually much more lightly contended, but typically an A or B woods rider will show to make it difficult. (e.g. Kurt Lynch, Altantic Moto Sports).
The crowd in 35 no jump is more consistent and frankly ends up being more fun because of it. You obviously can't jump however, so it's a different race. It ends up being all about the corners (in my opinion)
01-29-2008, 10:09 PM
It ends up being all about the corners (in my opinion)
Or who can scrub harderrof1
01-30-2008, 12:47 AM
Ok wise guy :-)
Kevin - this HS racer is invading our space in the MC forum!
01-31-2008, 12:50 PM
I welcome anyone to the No Jump. For those who have been in for a while we realize there is an art to this stuff.
OK maybe not an art, more like a 2 year old finger painting with mud.
Anyway it's fun!
vBulletin® v3.8.4, Copyright ©2000-2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.